Michele Goldberg has a very succinct explanation of Christian Nationalism.
It clearly cuts what these people really believe and what they are after.
Have no doubt that they are a political group, much like other facist political groups of the past.
They claim religion as the start of their ideology but these people are something else.
Who they are is purposely clouded with entanglements in various pseudo-religious groups.
The content of the article sounds very familiar to anyone who has had a discussion with a militant Christian Nationalist and sadly those same ideas have come out of the mouths of some of our states politicians.
For those tired of feeling like the Republican party has been taken over by these people, maybe its about time for the party to clearly state that certain ideas are not those of the Republican party and anyone believing or promoting those ideas should find the door. Let them form their own party rather than continuting to be a parasite on the Republicans. We know more than a few real Republicans that would be relieved to have this happen.
Either way, know what your dealing with and call these people what they are. Quit letting them hide behind a veil of religious protection.
From the article:
"
In the Christian nationalist vision of America, non-believers would be free to worship as they choose, as long as they know their place. When Venkatachalapathi Samuldrala became the first Hindu priest to offer an invocation before Congress, the Family Research Council issued a furious statement that reveals much about the America they'd like to create:
"While it is true that the United States of America was founded on the sacred principle of religious freedom for all, that liberty was never intended to exalt other religions to the level that Christianity holds in our country's heritage...Our founders expected that Christianity -- and no other religion -- would receive support from the government as long as that support did not violate peoples' consciences and their right to worship. They would have found utterly incredible the idea that all religions, including paganism, be treated with equal deference."
The iconography of Christian nationalism conflates the cross and the flag. As I write in "Kingdom Coming," it "claims supernatural sanction for its campaign of national renewal and speaks rapturously about vanquishing the millions of Americans who would stand in its way." At one rally at the statehouse in Austin, Texas, a banner pictured a fierce eagle perched upon a bloody cross. For a liberal, such imagery smacks of fascist agitprop. But plenty of deeply committed Christians also object to it as a form of blasphemy. It's important, I think, to separate their faith from the authoritarian impulses of the Christian nationalist movement. Christianity is a religion. Christian nationalism is a political program, and there is nothing sacred about it."